case western reserve university law school ranking Things To Know Before You Buy
case western reserve university law school ranking Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other sufficient remedy is provided by legislation." It really is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents with the boy or Female usually do not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they will do if they're able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
The a lot of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made distinct that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities issue to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-discipline duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is recognized and also the employee is found guilty after owing process of law, it's the prerogative from the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, from the various penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness from the act of misconduct just isn't adequate however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful method. Read more
A lot of the volumes (including more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be obtainable online through the Caselaw Access Project.
During the United States, people are not needed to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their individual can remember just one rule of thumb when it involves referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only on the case, but towards the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Lady do not approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they can Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste here or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who's a major, the few is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by regulation.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, plus the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for just a dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all performing in their Work with DCFS.
Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination at the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity from the pay out scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the distinct negation on the law laid down through the Supreme Court in its different pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. In the event the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar difficulty. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the law. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to inside the state court, within the same level.
Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is subject matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.